Logo

With so much evidence supporting the flat Earth theory, why aren't more resources dedicated to studying it?

Last Updated: 27.06.2025 05:56

With so much evidence supporting the flat Earth theory, why aren't more resources dedicated to studying it?

Just one person (like me) can provide at least two dozen disproofs of the Flat Earth - and at least another two dozen consequences that we’d EASILY be able to spot if the Earth was actually flat.

We have photos of the round earth taken by many hundreds of satellites - owned by many different governments AND by many companies AND (with “cubesats”) by kids in college.

No Flat Earther has EVER explained how a simple magnetic compass works in the southern hemisphere (or the region beyond the equatorial circle in their own maps).

Would the word literate carry the same meaning with public (common wealth) in 1900 vs today 2020?

This is direct evidence. No complicated thinking-about-it things to worry your tiny brains.

No Flat Earther has EVER explained the motion of the Sun and Moon around their flat earth model that can explain sunrise and sunset times all around the world.

Because this “evidence” that you imagine simply doesn’t exist - and yet the amount of evidence (indeed PROOF) that it’s nonsense is an enormous mountain:

Get Ready for More Commercials in Movie Theaters - The Hollywood Reporter

There’s a reason for that - it is literally, mathematically and geometrically impossible to do that other than on a sphere.

To pick just two things:

So - there you go. Two disproofs that no flat earther can explain.

My boss called me on a Saturday to let me know he that due to financial reasons, I was no longer needed effective immediatley. 3 days later, he sends me a text asking about work issues. How do I respond?

We have several hundred people who flew to space and saw it with their own eyes.

Your only defense against those claims is to yell “FAKE” or “CONSPIRACY”…but without any real reason why anyone would fake it - or what the conspiracists have to gain from this insanely difficult set of operations.

Now - there is NO piece of so-called evidence that you can provide that I cannot disprove. Try it. Post a piece of so-called flat-earth evidence in comments below - and I can single-handedly disprove it.

What are the potential implications of Meta withholding its multimodal AI models from the EU amid regulatory uncertainty?